From site potential to an investment story.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY · INVESTMENT POTENTIAL

ConceptLab Investment Score

Illustrative assessment using the same score calculation and sample inputs as the Turkish report.

Provisional score: infrastructure is excluded until sufficient utility evidence is available; the remaining weights are normalized to 100%. The ConceptLab Investment Score differs from the investment decision score. All sample market and location inputs are illustrative, not verified live data; this assessment is not investment advice.

01 · DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY

Site and planning assumptions

FAR refers to the floor area ratio (emsal). Here, GFA refers to the gross construction area included in FAR (emsale dahil inşaat alanı). Definitions vary by jurisdiction; these values are illustrative, not official planning rights.

SITE & PLANNING · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

Planning inputs and area calculations

These inputs demonstrate the same calculations as the Turkish sample; they do not describe official planning rights for a real site.

Illustrative setbacks

Area schedule

FAR is the floor area ratio; GFA here means the gross construction area included in FAR. Areas, setbacks and parking assumptions are illustrative and require independent planning confirmation.

02 · PROJECT MIX

Proposed uses

Prices and costs are scenario assumptions, not verified market offers.

03 · FEASIBILITY

Financial overview

Unlevered project model including the selected purchase price of USD 42,000,000. Calculations use the same sample inputs and feasibility engine as the Turkish report.

Project NPV is unlevered; it is not the financed equity NPV shown in some investment decision views. Actual results are uncertain.

Annual project cash flow

04 · SITE SCREENING

Topography and infrastructure

05 · CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT

Visual concepts and unit plans

Indicative concepts and furnished plans for communicating the development idea; not architectural or construction documents.

06 · MARKET & AUDIENCE

Market and target audience

Illustrative prices and positioning assumptions help demonstrate how the project mix can be considered against its intended audience. They are not live market data or verified transactions.

MARKETING · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

Marketing and sales programme

The illustrative strategy positions the mixed-use project around a pedestrian-oriented living environment for families and professionals.

Active sales channels

Launch and sales phases

Timing, sales shares, budget and channels are illustrative assumptions, not a sales forecast or verified market demand.

CONCEPT DESIGN · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

Concept design decisions

The selected example combines residential, office and street retail uses around a pedestrian-oriented courtyard. The development programme and images are illustrative.

The concept fit score uses the same screening calculation as the Turkish example. It reflects available scenario inputs, including whether a floor count and parcel outline are provided; it does not verify zoning compliance, architectural design, sustainability performance or an actual site's suitability. It is distinct from the ConceptLab Investment Score.

Illustrative design brief

Concept alternatives

Images communicate a development idea; they are not verified designs or construction documents. Planning requirements and technical feasibility need independent confirmation.

DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

Detailed area programme

The same illustrative area schedule shown in the Turkish project mix. GFA below refers to construction area included in FAR.

Total area combines saleable, parking, technical and shelter areas; GFA is shown separately and is not added again. These are scenario assumptions, not approved plans.

SITE SCREENING · ASSUMPTIONS

How the slope estimate is calculated

The sample assumes a 150 m horizontal distance: 12 m elevation difference ÷ 150 m × 100 = 8%. These figures are illustrative, not surveyed measurements; the section is not to scale.

MARKET · REPRESENTATIVE AUDIENCE

Target audience assessment

The sample positions the residential offer for upper-middle-income families and regional professionals. The following scores are illustrative assessments from the sample, not independent market research.

The audience score is a separate measure and should not be confused with the ConceptLab Investment Score.

COST & REVENUE · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

Development cost and revenue by use

The breakdown follows the same sample feasibility model. Amounts are illustrative assumptions in US dollars.

Site-work allowance is a preliminary slope-based screening estimate, not a measured bill of quantities. Additional utility connection assumptions shown elsewhere in the report are separate screening information and should not be added again without checking for overlap.

Modelled revenue by use

PRODUCT MIX · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

Residential unit mix

The sample combines 325 illustrative apartments. Areas are assumptions and do not represent approved architectural plans.

FINANCING · INVESTMENT REVIEW

Equity performance and sensitivity

Illustrative results use the same selected land price and financing calculation as the Turkish sample report. They reflect scenario assumptions, not verified investment returns.

Equity NPV and IRR include the sample debt and interest assumptions. Project profit is before financing; project NPV shown above is unlevered. Payback counts model periods, including the first period.

Illustrative investment thresholds

Equity cash flow

Equity NPV sensitivity

Rows change development costs; columns change revenues. Land value remains fixed. Values are equity NPV in USD and retain the sample financing assumptions.

INVESTMENT REVIEW · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

Investment decision and risk matrix

This illustrative decision summary uses the same financial model, thresholds and risk assumptions as the Turkish sample report.

The decision score weights financial performance at 75% and the risk matrix at 25%; it is distinct from the ConceptLab Investment Score. Risk levels below are sample assumptions, not verified risk findings. Payback counts model periods, including the first period.

Illustrative risk matrix

The financial thresholds and equity cash flow are shown in the financing section above. The scenario is not investment advice; planning, ownership, technical, market and financing assumptions require independent verification.

SITE ACCESS · REPRESENTATIVE DATA

Transport and nearby amenities

Distances and destinations are sample assumptions, not measurements or verified points of interest.

INFRASTRUCTURE · REPRESENTATIVE DATA

Indicative utility screening

These are assumptions entered for the sample, not utility-provider confirmations. Costs and timeframes require separate verification.

LAND PURCHASE · SCENARIO COMPARISON

Compare land price alternatives

Three land-value assumptions are evaluated using the same scenario calculations as the detailed Turkish sample. All figures are illustrative and are not an appraisal or offer.

The maximum price is calculated using the sample's 25% revenue-based developer-profit reserve. Equity results reflect the sample financing assumptions and differ from unlevered project NPV. The market signal is based on illustrative sample data.

INFRASTRUCTURE · REPRESENTATIVE SCENARIO

Indicative utility demand

The sample uses area-based assumptions to illustrate early screening; these are not utility-provider capacity calculations or official design standards.

Demand assumptions by use

Utility availability, connection requirements and capacity must be confirmed with the relevant providers. Illustrative connection costs are not automatically added to the project cash flow; check for overlap with site-work allowances.

08 · OPPORTUNITY POOL

Compare illustrative alternatives

Three representative scenarios from the same sample data, using the application's opportunity comparison calculation.

Data readiness reflects available inputs and whether the base-model NPV is positive; it is not the ConceptLab Investment Score. The pool's unlevered NPV and IRR use the base model excluding land value; the detailed project overview above includes the selected land price. The figures therefore serve different comparisons.